tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7149351664752156219.post6184335510582520456..comments2024-03-25T06:46:29.460-05:00Comments on Actualidad Filatélica: ECUADOR: NUEVA FECHA TEMPRANA PARA EL RESELLO TELEGRÁFICO DE 1892Actualidad Filatélicahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03105484686267934599noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7149351664752156219.post-33527848367173540942020-04-04T06:47:10.581-05:002020-04-04T06:47:10.581-05:00Ooeps, slip of the pen.
I meant: the first number ...Ooeps, slip of the pen.<br />I meant: the first number is greater than 12.<br />K.ZwartAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7149351664752156219.post-61080766133347232672020-03-28T11:13:43.944-05:002020-03-28T11:13:43.944-05:00Thanks Karel.
In this telegraph stamps de date es...Thanks Karel.<br /><br />In this telegraph stamps de date es month, day, year.Actualidad Filatélicahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03105484686267934599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7149351664752156219.post-56405890316732459112020-03-28T10:36:01.546-05:002020-03-28T10:36:01.546-05:00It can also be read differently dd-mm-yyyy.
I don&...It can also be read differently dd-mm-yyyy.<br />I don't see the explanation as proof, it's an assumption.<br />You can read it also as "11 february 1892".<br />I have a stamp where the 2nd number is greater than 12.<br />The ordinary round stamps all took the form of dd-mm-yyyy.<br />The Anglo-Saxon form only came into use over time<br />of the telegraph cables and the first Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com